ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To assess the application value of mapping allele with resolved carrier status (MaReCs) technique for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT).@*METHODS@#The characteristics of MaReCs for PGT and outcome of patients were retrospectively analyzed.@*RESULTS@#Compared with those who could not use the technique, carriers who have used the MaReCs technique were younger, had significantly higher level of anti-Mullerian hormone, more antral follicles, occytes, mature occytes, biopsied embryos and euploid embryos, and lower risks for de novo chromosomal abnormality (P 0.05). Carriers undergoing MaReCs test could preferentially select embryos with normal chromosome structures for the transfer.@*CONCLUSION@#Application of MaReCs has a prerequisite for having a minimum number of occytes and biopsied embryos and using discarded embryos sometimes. MaReCs is efficient for the detection of carrier status of embryos and attaining higher rate of pregnancy and live birth, which can significantly improve the outcome for couples carrying chromosomal translocations.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Alleles , Aneuploidy , Blastocyst , Fertilization in Vitro , Genetic Testing , Preimplantation Diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Translocation, GeneticABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and enhanced CT in the diagnosis of liver cancer.Methods:From January 2017 to December 2017, 72 patients with liver neoplasms who received treatment in Yuyao People's Hospital were selected as the subjects of this study.Enhanced CT scan and liver MRI scan were used in all patients respectively to compare the examination conditions of the two scanning methods for the lesions, the positive rate and accuracy of the detection, as well as the sensitivity and specificity of the two methods.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in the detection of extrahepatic lesions between the two methods(41.67% vs.36.11%, P>0.05). The detective rate of intrahepatic lesions of MRI (94.44%) was higher than that of enhanced CT(77.78%), the difference was statistically significant(χ 2=8.361, P<0.05). The missed diagnosis rate[5.56%(4/72)], misdiagnosis rate[1.39%(1/72)] of MRI were lower than those of enhanced CT[22.22%(16/72), 11.11%( 8/72)], and the accuracy of MRI[93.06%(67/72)] was higher than that of enhanced CT[66.67%(48/72)], the differences were statistically significant(χ 2=8.361, 4.354, 15.587, all P<0.05). The sensitivity[92.86%(52/56)], specificity[93.75%(15/16)] of MRI were higher than those of enhanced CT[71.43%(40/56), 50.00%(8/16)](χ 2=8.675, 7.575, all P<0.05). Conclusion:In the clinical diagnosis of liver cancer, the diagnostic accuracy of liver MRI is relatively high, which is conducive to the establishment and implementation of patients' treatment plan, and is conducive to clinical application and promotion.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the clinical value of ultrasonography, multi-slice spiral computed tomography(MSCT) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP) in the early diagnosis of cholelithiasis.Methods:The clinical data of 140 patients with suspected cholelithiasis treated in Yuyao People's Hospital from January 2017 to March 2019 were reviewed.All the patients were examined by ultrasonography, MSCT and MRCP.Based on the results of operation, the diagnostic results of ultrasonography, MSCT and MRCP were compared, and the consistency between the diagnostic results was analyzed.Results:Of 140 patients with suspected cholelithiasis, 100 cases were confirmed to be cholelithiasis by operation.The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRCP were 97.00%(97/100), 95.00%(38/40) and 96.43%(135/140), which were higher than those of ultrasonography[87.00% (87/100), 80.00%(32/40), 85.00%(119/140)] and MSCT[89.00%(89/100), 77.50%(31/40) and 85.71%(120/140)](χ 2=6.794, 4.114, 10.854, χ 2=4.916, 5.165, 9.882, all P<0.05). The consistency between MRCP and surgical diagnosis was good, but the consistency between ultrasound, MSCT and surgical diagnosis was moderate. Conclusion:The accuracy of MRCP is better than ultrasound and MSCT in the diagnosis of cholelithiasis, which has good diagnostic value and can reduce the missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of cholelithiasis.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical value of magnetic resonance imaging( MRI) in the diagnosis and classification of perianal abscess and anal fistula.Methods Eighty patients with suspected perianal abscess and anal fistula were selected in Yuyao People＇s Hospital from May 2016 to December 2017.They were divided into general examination group and MRI group by random number table,with 40 cases in each group. The general examination group underwent ultrasound examination,and the MRI group underwent MRI examination.The detection rate of MRI examination for various types of perianal abscess and anal fistula was analyzed based on the results of operation. Results In the general examination group, the diagnostic accuracy of anal fistula supervisor, anal fistula internal orifice,perianal abscess and anal fistula branch were 65.0% (26/40),70.0% (28/40),57.5% (23/40) and 52.5% (21/40),respectively,which in the MRI group were 92.5% (37/40),77.5% (31/40),87.5% (35/40) and 95.0% (38/40),respectively.There were statistically significant differences in diagnostic accuracy of anal fistula supervisor, perianal abscess and anal fistula branch between the two groups ( χ2 =9.054,7.116,8.865, all P <0.05). The effective rate of operation in the MRI group was 67.5% (27/40),which was significantly higher than that in the general examination group [67.5% (27/40)],the difference was statistically significant(χ2 =9.935,P<0.01). Conclusion Using MRI to diagnose perianal abscess and anal fistula can accurately judge the number,involvement range,specific location and surrounding structure of the abscess and anal fistula,and has important value for clinical treatment and prognosis.